• Home
  • About
  • British Royal Family
  • European royal families
  • Romanian Royal Family
  • Anniversaries & Birthdays
  • Films & Interviews
  • Exhibitions
  • Royal Ceremonies
  • Royal jewels
  • Weekly Picture
  • Historic Residences
  • Gallery

Diana Mandache's Weblog

~ Royal History

Diana Mandache's Weblog

Category Archives: World War One

Great War memorial on village green with the effigy of King Ferdinand of Romania

23 Monday Aug 2010

Posted by Diana Mandache in Romanian Royal Family, Weekly Picture, World War One

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Balkans, Familia regala, Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen, istoria regalitatii, King Ferdinand, Primul Razboi mondial, Queen Marie of Romania, Regele Ferdinand, Romanian Royal Family, South-East European Monarchs, WWI

The Great War Memorial for the fallen soldiers in the village of Zatreni, Valcea county/ Photograph ©Valentin Mandache

This post is dedicated to the anniversary tomorrow, 24 August, of King Ferdinand of Romania’s birthday (1865 – 1927), the sovereign of the country during the Great War.

The citizens of Zatreni in south west Romania, paid a high price during the Great War, with 233 men killed in action, a huge loss for a village. The memorial on the village green dedicated to the local heroes features a well rendered effigy of King Ferdinand, the supreme commander of the Romanian army, seen in the above photograph. The monument, most amazingly, survived the the communist period, probably because there was no inscription mentioning the sovereign’s name on the monument, which made the local communist authorities to propagate the idea that the bas-relief represented just a Great War era soldier personifying the army. Romania’s entry into the war on the side of the Entente was decided by a special Crown Council on 27 August 1916.   DM

King Ferdinand’s Proclamation – 28 August 1916

Romanians! The war which for the last two years has been encircling our frontiers more and more closely has shaken the ancient foundations of Europe to their depths. It has brought the day which has been awaited for centuries by the national conscience, by the founders of the Romanian State, by those who united the principalities in the war of independence, by those responsible for the national renaissance. It is the day of the union of all branches of our nation.  Today we are able to complete the task of our forefathers and to establish forever what Michael the Brave was only able to establish for a short moment, namely, a Romanian union on both slopes of the Carpathians. [...] In our moral energy and our valour lie the means of giving him back his birthright of a great and free Rumania from the Tisza to the Black Sea, and to prosper in peace in accordance with our customs and our hopes and dreams.

Romanians! Animated by the holy duty imposed upon us, and determined to bear manfully all the sacrifices inseparable from an arduous war, we will march into battle with the irresistible élan of a people firmly confident in its destiny.  The glorious fruits of victory shall be our reward. Forward, with the help of God!  FERDINAND   [Source: Records of the Great War, vol.V, National Alumni, 1923]

All rights reserved Diana Mandache’s Weblog Royal History

see also Forgotten Basreliefs representing Romanian royals

Share this:

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Weekly Picture: Forgotten Basreliefs Representing Romanian royals

02 Monday Nov 2009

Posted by Diana Mandache in Romanian Royal Family, World War One, Bucharest, Weekly Picture

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen, Romanian Royal Family, Bucharest, Queen Marie of Romania, Regina Maria, Familia regala, King Ferdinand of Romania, Regele Ferdinand, Bucuresti, European royal families, WWI, Monuments, istoria regalitatii, Noblesse et Royautés, South-East European Monarchs

The Romanian Army Medical Corps Heroes Memorial in Bucharest: basrelief. (Weekly Picture: Diana Mandache's weblog Royal History; Photograph ©Valentin Mandache)

The Romanian Army Medical Corps Heroes Memorial (Monumentul Eroilor Sanitari) in Bucharest: bronze basrelief representing part of the Romanian royal family receiving high ranking officers of the the Romanian Army in the First World War. Queen Marie is represented as a nurse at the basrelief’s centre, Prince Nicholas in cadet uniform-second from left and Princess Elisabeta also as a nurse on the left hand side. The scene probably depicts an official scene from 1917 on the Moldavian front. There is no inscription on the monument mentioning the name of the Romanian royals. That was the main reason why it survived during communist period, when the party officials, a very ignorant lot in matters of royal history, saw the basreliefs as general war time representations and left them in place. These basreliefs and what they represent are still virtually unknown by the Bucharest people, and Romanians in general, with very few press articles mentioning them in the twenty years since the fall of communism. The memorial is the masterwork of Raffaello Romanelli in 1932 and is located nearby Cotroceni Palace, the former residence of King Ferdinand and his queen consort.

Queen Marie of Romania. Regina Maria on Facebook

*****************

I endeavour in the “Weekly Pictures” post series to bring to light worthy of note, often less known images from the royal past and present and thus further enhance the understanding of royal history and what it represents for us.

Weekly picture: Diana Mandache’s weblog Royal History.

All rights reserved ©www.royalromania.wordpress.com

******************************************************************************************************************************************************************

Share this:

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Queen Marie of Romania, Colonel Joe Boyle and the Canadians

01 Monday Jun 2009

Posted by Diana Mandache in Romanian Royal Family, World War One

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

First World War, Romanian Royal Family, Queen Marie of Romania, Queen Victoria, Regina Maria, Familia regala, WWI, Colonel Joseph Boyle, Arthur Duke of Connaught, Governors of Canada

QUEEN MARIE OF ROMANIA, COLONEL BOYLE AND THE CANADIANS:

A Meeting of Identities

By Diana Mandache and Valentin Mandache

Lecture delivered at the residence of Ms Marta Moszczenska the Ambassador of Canada in Romania, on 5 May 2009, with the occasion of 90 years celebration of bilateral relations Canada – Romania

Formal bilateral relations between countries are in many aspects the concluding official recognition that those nations share common values and ideals, which first started at the level of individuals and progressed in time and magnitude to that between states.

Romania and Canada are celebrating 90 years of bilateral relations initiated in the aftermath of the Great War by the excellent rapport between Queen Marie and many Canadian soldiers, officials and ordinary persons that so selflessly contributed in diverse ways to the relief of the Romanian people at that very difficult moment in their history.

That rapport and its far reaching practical results were overseen and facilitated by the outstanding work of Colonel Joseph Boyle and had at its basis the great understanding and collaboration between him and Queen Marie, two complex and remarkable personalities.

There is a multitude of views and written analyses exploring this relationship, emphasizing the diverse aspects of their personality, mutual respect or friendship. However, these accounts almost always overlook as something minor or self-explanatory the essential feature of their shared values as individuals formed and educated in the Victorian era, sharing an identity forged within the confines of the British polity and its dominions, of which Canada and Newfoundland were then integral parts.

In my view the shared identity and values of Marie and Boyle are the true background of their fruitful collaboration, embodied in Queen Marie’s excellent relations with the Canadians in the war relief effort. It is a meeting and overlap of identities that made their joint effort efficient and productive at a time of great need for Romania.

Queen Marie of Romania

‘I was born in Victorian days and have been part of the transition to what we call Modernism’ is how Queen Marie of Romania in her own words encapsulates the spiritual milieu of her eventful life[1].

In her autobiography “The Story of My Life” we can get glimpses of this identity when she describes the predicaments and dealings with everyday problems during her first years in her adoptive country, pointing out that: ‘I am an Anglo – Saxon, […]. I am fundamentally a believer; I believe in good, in God, in Justice, in Love and Pity. […] I came to Romania like a young and joyous warrior ready to enter your ranks, to salute your colours, to march bravely in your lines, a song on my lips, glad of any adventure, any effort, daring, perhaps unconventional, but yours, heart and soul.[2]’ That is precisely the typical doer attitude cultivated by the Victorians in their quest for new opportunities and enterprise in the then globalised world of the British polity.

Colonel Joe Boyle w. Romanian medals

Colonel Boyle was also a true product of that great epoch, of men of action, path openers and independent adventurers that can be traced back since the Elizabethan age that put the basis of the British overseas settlements and states. I found a fitting parallel with Boyle in a similar early example from the 16thcentury’s Captain John Smith, the founder of Virginia who had part of his early military career in what is now the Romanian provinces of Transylvania and Wallachia and fought for the Prince Michael the Brave, the first Romanian ruler to achieve the unification of lands inhabited by Romanians, circumstances that happened again over three centuries later in the midst of the Great War under King Ferdinand and Queen Marie for whom Colonel Boyle did his outstanding faithful service and contribution.

Boyle’s universe and mentality were well understood by Marie who aptly says about him that ‘made all wailing seem paltry, almost cowardly… In times of depression he was an extraordinarily refreshing and invigorating companion, and an unexpected touch of early Victorian Puritanism added much to his quaintness[3]’.

There is also another less obvious and more convoluted aspect of these two personalities’ shared identity, namely that both were at the same time developing identities pertaining to that their own young nations, Marie as a part of the Romanian people’s struggle in the Great War for the national unity, against immensely more powerful enemies; Boyle as a Canadian who was part of the great effort and sacrifices made by the Canadian soldiers fighting on Europe’s bloody battlefields such as Vimy Ridge or Passchendaele, forging the modern identity of Canada. Those developing national identities although separated by geography and historical experience, had nevertheless common features brought about by the epic struggles in the First World War and made possible that meeting of identities between Queen Marie as a representative of the Romanian people and the Canadians.

Continue reading »

Share this:

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Documents: Paderewski on the Paris Peace Conference, May 1919

13 Friday Mar 2009

Posted by Diana Mandache in World War One

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

First World War, Paderewski, Paris Peace Conference, Poland, WWI

Address by Ignacy Paderewski, May 1919

The Polish nation is today living through solemn moments. I suppose that in its eventual history there was never a time more solemn, more fateful than the present.  The fate of our country is at stake; powerful people holding in their hands the destiny of the world, are building a framework for our independent existence, are deciding the frontiers of our State, and soon will pronounce a final sentence, from which, no doubt for long years, there will be no appeal, perhaps for many generations.

Violent bursts of hope and of joy and anxiety are strongly shaking our national spirit.  From every side, from every corner of our former commonwealth, people are coming here to Warsaw and going there to Paris, in frock coats and smock frocks, in old-fashioned country dress, in mountaineer costume, and they cry aloud and implore that their distant provinces should be united to the Polish state.  The Polish eagle does not seem to be a bird of prey, since people are gathering themselves under its wings. What will Poland be like?  What will be her frontiers?  Will they give us everything we should have? These are the questions that every Pole is asking.  I am here to answer, as far as I am able, all these questions.  I have taken part in the work of the Polish Delegation to the Peace Conference, and I am here to report on this work to the Seym, and I ask for attention. I will begin with what has been done.  The Conference has only dealt as yet with one of their defeated adversaries, the Germans.  Conditions have been dictated to them, though they are not yet signed, which give us considerable advantages on the west frontier. We are not all satisfied with our frontier.  I admit freely that I belong to the unsatisfied ones; but have we really a right to complain? 

The Conference tried to decide justly according to the rule on ethnographical and national majority as regards all territorial questions. They applied this rule to our territory, and we have obtained considerable advantages from it on the west.  But not everything was decided according to this principle.  Continue reading »

Share this:

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Woodrow Wilson seen by Queen Marie of Romania, Paris Peace Conference 1919

03 Tuesday Mar 2009

Posted by Diana Mandache in Romanian Royal Family, World War One

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

Clemenceau, documents, First World War, History, Lloyd George, Paris Peace Conference, Queen Marie of Romania, Regina Maria, Royalty, Woodrow Wilson, World War One, WWI

Georges Clemenceau, Woodrow Wilson, Lloyd George leaving Palace of Versailles - Diana Mandache collection

Georges Clemenceau, Woodrow Wilson, Lloyd George leaving Palace of Versailles - Diana Mandache collection

«My meeting with president Wilson was to me, an interesting episode. He was then at the zenith of his spectacular career. The World had selected him as the great Arbiter of peace. Wherever he went, he was being received as a sort of Messiah; the fuss made about him was enough to turn a god’s head. This extreme adulation, this elevation of an outsider to first position in the seething Europe of that day, belongs, according to me, to the special ‘war nevrose’ of the time. Humanity was searching for a superman who would be able to allay the evil spirits let loose by four years appalling war, so it fastened its hope and illusions upon the long faced, sober-looking man from beyond the seas. President Wilson, whose language was so wise, was he not the one indicated to lead the way, to trace a road others could follow, a man to whose advice would be worth listening, who, because not an European, would be a perfectly unbiased umpire, judging all questions impartially and without passion? The world has an instinctive need of idols. It likes to set them up and bow down to them, without pausing to enquire if perchance they may have feet of clay. And even if at first the idol of the day is somewhat bewildered by this sudden uplifting to giddy heights, he gradually begins to agree with those proclaiming his superior merits; for praise and adulation are difficult to resist. Finally he believes in his superior perfection and enjoys the part he has been told to play, fitting comfortable into the niche selected for him. But humans are fickle, and are as ready to pull down as to set up. They even do this with a certain, to me, incomprehensible gusto, as though revenging themselves upon the unfortunate idol for their own mistaken enthusiasm. Continue reading »

Share this:

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Documents: Paul von Hindenburg on Kaiser’s Abdication

02 Monday Mar 2009

Posted by Diana Mandache in European royal families, World War One

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

documents, Emperor Wilhelm II, European royal families, Familia regala, First World War, Germany, History, Kaiser, Max of Baden, World War One, WWI

20 March 1919: Hindenburg on Kaiser’s Abdication

Public opinion has been recently discussing the question why the Kaiser went to Holland. To obviate erroneous judgments, I should like to make the following brief observations.

 When the Imperial Chancellor, Prince Max of Baden, announced the Kaiser’s abdication on November 9th, without the Kaiser’s previous declaration of assent, the German Army was not beaten, but its strength had dwindled and the enemy had fresh masses in readiness for a new attack.

 The conclusion of the armistice was directly impending. At this moment of the highest military tension revolution broke out in Germany, the insurgents seized the Rhine bridges, important arsenals, and traffic centres in the rear of the army, thereby endangering the supply of ammunition and provisions, while the supplies in the hands of the troops were only enough to last for a few days.

 The troops on the lines of communication and the reserves disbanded themselves, and unfavourable reports arrived concerning the reliability of the field army proper. In view of this state of affairs the peaceful return home of the Kaiser was no longer to be thought of and could only have been enforced at the head of loyal troops. In that case the complete collapse of Germany was inevitable, and civil war would have been added to the fighting with the enemy without, who would doubtless have pressed on with all his energy. Continue reading »

Share this:

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Documents: Raymond Poincare – Paris Peace Conference, 18 January 1919

11 Thursday Dec 2008

Posted by Diana Mandache in World War One

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

Clemenceau, documents, History, Paris, Peace Conference, Poincare, World War One, WWI

Raymond Poincare

Raymond Poincare

Raymond Poincare’s Welcoming Address

 

Gentlemen,

                France greets and welcomes you and thanks you for having unanimously chosen as the seat of your labours the city which, for over four years, the enemy has made his principal military objective and which the valour of the Allied armies has victoriously defended against unceasingly renewed offensives.

Allow me to see in your decision the homage of all the nations that you represent towards a country which, still more than any others, has endured the sufferings of war, of which entire provinces, transformed into vast battlefields, have been systematically wasted by the invader, and which has paid the heaviest tribute to death.

France has borne these enormous sacrifices without having incurred the slightest responsibility for the frightful cataclysm which has overwhelmed the universe, and at the moment when this cycle of horror is ending, all the Powers whose delegates are assembled here may acquit themselves of any share in the crime which has resulted in so unprecedented a disaster.

                What gives you authority to establish a peace of justice is the fact that none of the peoples of whom you are the delegates has had any part in injustice.  Humanity can place confidence in you because you are not among those who have outraged the rights of humanity.

There is no need of further information or for special inquiries into the origin of the drama which has just shaken the world.  The truth, bathed in blood, has already escaped from the Imperial archives.  The premeditated character of the trap is today clearly proved. In the hope of conquering, first, the hegemony of Europe and next the mastery of the world, the Central Empires, bound together by a secret plot, found the most abominable pretexts for trying to crush Serbia and force their way to the East.  At the same time they disowned the most solemn undertakings in order to crush Belgium and force their way into the heart of France.

                These are the two unforgettable outrages which opened the way to aggression.  The combined efforts of Great Britain, France, and Russia broke themselves against that mad arrogance. If, after long vicissitudes, those who wished to reign by the sword have perished by the sword, they have but themselves to blame; they have been destroyed by their own blindness.  What could be more significant than the shameful bargains they attempted to offer to Great Britain and France at the end of July 1914, when to Great Britain they suggested: “Allow us to attack France on land and we will not enter the Channel”; and when they instructed their Ambassador to say to France: “We will only accept a declaration of neutrality on your part if you surrender to us Briey, Toul, and Verdun”?

It is in the light of these memories, gentlemen, that all the conclusions you will have to draw from the war will take shape.

                Your nations entered the war successively, but came, one and all, to the help of threatened right.  Like Germany, Great Britain and France had guaranteed the independence of Belgium. Germany sought to crush Belgium.  Great Britain and France both swore to save her.  Thus, from the very beginning of hostilities, came into conflict the two ideas which for fifty months were to struggle for the dominion of the world – the idea of sovereign force, which accepts neither control nor check, and the idea of justice, which depends on the sword only to prevent or repress the abuse of strength. Faithfully supported by her Dominions and Colonies, Great Britain decided that she could not remain aloof from a struggle in which the fate of every country was involved.  She has made, and her Dominions and Colonies have made with her, prodigious efforts to prevent the war from ending in the triumph of the spirit of conquest and the destruction of right.

                Japan, in her turn, only decided to take up arms out of loyalty to Great Britain, her great Ally, and from the consciousness of the danger in which both Asia and Europe would have stood, for the hegemony of which the Germanic Empires had dreamt.

                Italy, who from the first had refused to lend a helping hand to German ambition, rose against an age-long foe only to answer the call of oppressed populations and to destroy at the cost of her blood the artificial political combination which took no account of human liberty.

Rumania resolved to fight only to realize that national unity which was opposed by the same powers of arbitrary force.  Abandoned, betrayed, and strangled, she had to submit to an abominable treaty, the revision of which you will exact.

                Greece, whom the enemy for many months tried to turn from her traditions and destinies, raised an army only to escape attempts at domination, of which she felt the growing threat. Portugal, China, and Siam abandoned neutrality only to escape the strangling pressure of the Central Powers. Thus it was the extent of German ambitions that brought so many peoples, great and small, to form a league against the same adversary.

                And what shall I say of the solemn resolution taken by the United States in the spring of 1917 under the auspices of their illustrious President, Mr. Wilson, whom I am happy to greet here in the name of grateful France, and, if you will allow me to say so, gentlemen, in the name of all the nations represented in this room?

What shall I say of the many other American Powers which either declared themselves against Germany – Brazil, Cuba, Panama, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Haiti, Honduras – or at least broke off diplomatic relations – Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador, Uruguay? From north to south the New World rose with indignation when it saw the empires of Central Europe, after having let loose the war without provocation and without excuse, carry it on with fire, pillage, and massacre of inoffensive beings.

                The intervention of the United States was something more, something greater, than a great political and military event: it was a supreme judgment passed at the bar of history by the lofty conscience of a free people and their Chief Magistrate on the enormous responsibilities incurred in the frightful conflict which was lacerating humanity. It was not only to protect themselves from the audacious aims of German megalomania that the United States equipped fleets and created immense armies, but also, and above all, to defend an ideal of liberty over which they saw the huge shadow of the Imperial Eagle encroaching farther every day.

America, the daughter of Europe, crossed the ocean to wrest her mother from the humiliation of thraldom and to save civilization.  The American people wished to put an end to the greatest scandal that has ever sullied the annals of mankind.

                Autocratic governments, having prepared in the secrecy of the Chancelleries and the General Staff a map programme of universal domination, at the time fixed by their genius for intrigue let loose their packs and sounded the horns for the chase, ordering science at the very time when it was beginning to abolish distances, bring men closer, and make life sweeter, to leave the bright sky towards which it was soaring and to place itself submissively at the service of violence, lowering the religious idea to the extent of making God the complacent auxiliary of their passions and the accomplice of their crimes; in short, counting as naught the traditions and wills of peoples, the lives of citizens, the honour of women, and all those principles of public and private morality which we for our part have endeavoured to keep unaltered through the war and which neither nations nor individuals can repudiate or disregard with impunity.

While the conflict was gradually extending over the entire surface of the earth the clanking of chains was heard here and there, and captive nationalities from the depths of their age-long jails cried out to us for help.

Yet more, they escaped to come to our aid.  Poland came to life again and sent us troops.  The Czecho-Slovaks won their right to independence in Siberia, in France, and in Italy.  The Jugo-Slays, the Armenians, the Syrians and Lebanese, the Arabs, all the oppressed peoples, all the victims, long helpless or resigned, of great historic deeds of injustice, all the martyrs of the past, all the outraged consciences, all the strangled liberties revived at the clash of our arms, and turned towards us, as their natural defenders. Thus the war gradually attained the fullness of its first significance, and became, in the fullest sense of the term, a crusade of humanity for Right; and if anything can console us in part at least, for the losses we have suffered, it is assuredly the thought that our victory is also the victory of Right.

                This victory is complete, for the enemy only asked for the armistice to escape from an irretrievable military disaster.  In the interest of justice and peace it now rests with you to reap from this victory its full fruits in order to carry out this immense task.  You have decided to admit, at first, only the Allied or associated Powers, and, in so far as their interests are involved in the debates, the nations which remained neutral.

You have thought that the terms of peace ought to be settled among ourselves before they are communicated to those against whom we have together fought the good fight.  The solidarity which has united us during the war and has enabled us to win military success ought to remain unimpaired during the negotiations for, and after the signing of, the Treaty. It is not only governments, but free peoples, who are represented here.  Through the test of danger they have learned to know and help one another.  They want their intimacy of yesterday to assure the peace of tomorrow. Vainly would our enemies seek to divide us.  If they have not yet renounced their customary manoeuvres, they will soon find that they are meeting today, as during the hostilities, a homogeneous block which nothing will be able to disintegrate. Even before the armistice you placed that necessary unity under the standard of the lofty moral and political truths of which President Wilson has nobly made himself the interpreter.

And in the light of those truths you intend to accomplish your mission.  You will, therefore, seek nothing but justice, “justice that has no favourites,” justice in territorial problems, justice in financial problems, justice in economic problems.

                But justice is not inert, it does not submit to injustice.  What it demands first, when it has been violated, are restitution and reparation for the peoples and individuals who have been despoiled or maltreated.  In formulating this lawful claim, it obeys neither hatred nor an instinctive or thoughtless desire for reprisals.  It pursues a twofold object – to render to each his due, and not to encourage crime through leaving it unpunished.

What justice also demands, inspired by the same feeling, is the punishment of the guilty and effective guaranties against an active return of the spirit by which they were tempted; and it is logical to demand that these guaranties should be given, above all, to the nations that have been, and might again be most exposed to aggressions or threats, to those who have many times stood in danger of being submerged by the periodic tide of the same invasions. What justice banishes is the dream of conquest and imperialism, contempt for national will, the arbitrary exchange of provinces between states as though peoples were but articles of furniture or pawns in a game. The time is no more when diplomatists could meet to redraw with authority the map of the empires on the corner of a table.  If you are to remake the map of the world it is in the name of the peoples, and on condition that you shall faithfully interpret their thoughts, and respect the right of nations, small and great, to dispose of themselves, and to reconcile it with the right, equally sacred, of ethnical and religious minorities – a formidable task, which science and history, your two advisers, will contribute to illumine and facilitate.

                You will naturally strive to secure the material and moral means of subsistence for all those peoples who are constituted or reconstituted into states; for those who wish to unite themselves to their neighbours; for those who divide themselves into separate units; for those who reorganize themselves according to their regained traditions; and, lastly, for all those whose freedom you have already sanctioned or are about to sanction.

You will not call them into existence only to sentence them to death immediately.  You would like your work in this, as in all other matters, to be fruitful and lasting. While thus introducing into the world as much harmony as possible, you will, in conformity with the fourteenth of the propositions unanimously adopted by the Great Allied Powers, establish a general League of Nations, which will be a supreme guarantee against any fresh assaults upon the right of peoples.

                You do not intend this International Association to be directed against anybody in future.  It will not of set purpose shut out anybody, but, having been organized by the nations that have sacrificed themselves in defence of Right, it will receive from them its statutes and fundamental rules.  It will lay down conditions to which its present or future adherents will submit, and, as it is to have for its essential aim to prevent, as far as. possible, the renewal of wars, it will, above all, seek to gain respect for the peace which you will have established, and will find it the less difficult to maintain in proportion as this peace will in itself imply greater realities of justice and safer guaranties of stability.

                By establishing this new order of things you will meet the aspiration of humanity, which, after the frightful convulsions of these bloodstained years, ardently wishes to feel itself protected by a union of free peoples against the ever-possible revivals of primitive savagely.

An immortal glory will attach to the names of the nations and the men who have desired to co-operate in this grand work in faith and brotherhood, and who have taken pains to eliminate from the future peace causes of disturbance and instability.

                This very day forty-eight years ago, on January 18, 1871, the German Empire was proclaimed by an army of invasion in the Chateau at Versailles.  It was consecrated by the theft of two French provinces; it was thus vitiated from its origin and by the fault of the founders; born in injustice, it has ended in opprobrium. You are assembled in order to repair the evil that it has done and to prevent a recurrence of it.  You hold in your hands the future of the world.  I leave you, gentlemen, to your grave deliberations, and I declare the Conference of Paris open.

[Source: Records of the Great War, Vol. VII, National Alumni 1923]

Share this:

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Documents: Woodrow Wilson – Paris Peace Conference, 18 January 1919

10 Wednesday Dec 2008

Posted by Diana Mandache in World War One

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

Clemenceau, documents, History, Peace Conference, Poincare, World War One

 

President Woodrow Wilson

President Woodrow Wilson

 

I have the great honour to propose as definitive president of this conference the French Premier, M. Clemenceau. I do so in conformity with usage.  I should do it even if it were only a question of paying homage to the French Republic, but I do it also because I desire, and you certainly desire with me, to pay homage to the man himself.

France, as it is, would alone deserve this honour, but we are today in her capital, and it is here that this great Conference has met.  France, by her sufferings and sacrifices during the war, deserves a special tribute.  Moreover, Paris is her ancient and splendid capital, where more than once these great assemblages, on which the fate of the world has depended, have met.

  I am happy to think that the meeting which is beginning crowns the series of these meetings.  This Conference may be considered in some respects as the final crowning of the diplomatic history of the world tip to this day, for never have so many nations been represented at the same time to solve problems which in so high a degree interest the whole world.

Moreover, this meeting signifies for us the end of this terrible war, which threatened to destroy civilization and the world itself.  It is a delightful sensation for us to feel that we are meeting at a moment when this terrible menace has ceased to exist.

But it is not only to France, it is to the man who is her great servant that we wish to pay homage and to do honour.  We have learned, since we have had relations with him, and since he has been at the head of the French Government, to admire the power of his direction and the force and good sense of his actions.  But, more than this, those who know him, those who have worked in close connection with him, have acquired for him a real affection.  Those who, like ourselves, have seen him work in these recent times know how much he is united with us, and with what ardour he is working for that which we ourselves desire.

 

 

For we all desire the same thing.  We desire before all to lift from the shoulders of humanity the frightful weight which is pressing on them, so that humanity, released from this weight, may at last return joyfully to work. Thus, gentlemen, it is not only to the Premier of the French Republic, it is to M. Clemenceau that I propose you should give the presidency of this assemblage.

 [Source: Records of the Great War, Vol. VII, National Alumni 1923]

              

Share this:

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

90 years ago in Bucharest King Ferdinand & Queen Marie

01 Monday Dec 2008

Posted by Diana Mandache in Bucharest, Romanian Royal Family, World War One

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

Bucharest, Bucuresti, Casa Regala, Familia regala, First World War, Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen, King Ferdinand of Romania, Queen Marie of Romania, Regele Ferdinand, Regina Maria, Romania, Romanian Royal Family, World War One

Bucharest during the German occupation, winter 1917/1918

Bucharest during the German occupation, winter 1917/1918

1 December 1918

King Ferdinand & Queen Marie, 1 Dec 1918 Bucharest (Diana Mandache collection)

“Yes, we were actually back! The long nightmare was over, we had returned to our home victorious: Greater Romania was a fact, and we were hailed as the first King and Queen of all the Romanians… Everywhere new situations had sprung up, the map of Europe had changed, thrones had crumbled, and readjustment after such a frightful upheaval was uneasy work … After two years’ occupation, Romania had been mercilessly plundered; the enemy had laid hands upon absolutely everything. Food was becoming scarcer and scarcer; we were once more facing famine. The shops were empty, even the most elementary necessities could not be had for love nor money. No material for clothes, no shoes, no soap, no medicine!… Between our country and those of our allies lay the lands of the defeated, with uncertain frontiers and Bolshevism raging al around us. The old order of things had been overthrown and the new map of Europe had not yet taken definite shape …” [Source: “Later Chapters of My Life. The Lost Memoir of Queen Marie of Romania”, 2004, Diana Mandache]

©Diana Mandache and http://royalromania.wordpress.com 2008. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Diana Mandache and http://royalromania.wordpress.com “Diana Mandache’s Weblog – Royal History” with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Share this:

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Documents: Georges Clemenceau – Paris Peace Conference 1919

23 Sunday Nov 2008

Posted by Diana Mandache in World War One

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

Georges Clemenceau Le Tigre, Peace Conference, Romania, World World War

 

Georges Clemenceau’s Opening Address at the Paris Peace Conference, 18 January 1919

Georges Clemenceau

Georges Clemenceau

  

Gentlemen, you would not understand it if, after listening to the words of the two eminent men who have just spoken, I were to keep silent. I cannot elude the necessity of expressing my lively gratitude, my deep gratitude, both to the illustrious President Wilson and to the Prime Minister of Great Britain, as well as to Baron Sonnino, for the words which they have uttered.

In the past, in the days of my youth – long ago now, as Mr. Lloyd George has reminded me – when I traveled over America and England, I used always to hear the French blamed for that excess of politeness which led them beyond the boundaries of the truth.  Listening to the American statesman and the British statesman, I asked myself whether in Paris they had not acquired our national vice of flattering urbanity.

It is necessary, gentlemen, to point out that my election is due necessarily to lofty international tradition, and to the time-honoured courtesy shown toward the country which has the honour to welcome the Peace Conference in its capital.  The proofs of “friendship” – as they will allow me to call it – of President Wilson and Mr. Lloyd George touched me profoundly, because in these proofs may be seen a new force for all three of us which will enable us, with the help of this entire Conference, to carry through the arduous task entrusted to us.  I draw new confidence from it for the success of our efforts.

President Wilson has good authority for his remark that we have here for the first time a collection of delegates from all the civilized peoples of the earth.  The greater the sanguinary catastrophe which devastated and ruined one of the richest regions of France, the more ample and more splendid should be the reparation – not merely the reparation for material acts, the ordinary reparation, if I may venture to say so, which is due to us – but the nobler and loftier reparation – we are going to try to secure, so that the peoples may at last escape from this fatal embrace, which, heaping up ruins and sorrows, terrorizes the populations and prevents them from devoting themselves freely to their work for fear of the enemies who may spring up at any moment.

It is a great and noble ambition that has come to us all.  We must hope that success will crown our efforts.  This can only be if we have our ideas clear-cut and well defined. I said in the Chamber of Deputies some days ago, and I make a point of repeating the statement here, that success is possible only if we remain firmly united.  We have come here as friends.  We must pass through that door as brothers.  That is the first reflection which I am anxious to express to you.  Everything must be subordinated to the necessity for a closer and closer union between the peoples which have taken part in this Great War.

The Society of Nations has its being here, it has its being in you.  It is for you to make it live, and for that there is no sacrifice to which we are not ready to consent.  I do not doubt that as you are all of this disposition we shall arrive at this result, but only on condition that we exercise impartial pressure on ourselves to reconcile what in appearance may be opposing interests in the higher view of a greater, happier, and better humanity. That, gentlemen, is what I had to say to you.

I am touched beyond all expression by the proof of confidence and regard which you have been kind enough to give me.  The program of the Conference, the aim marked out by President Wilson, is no longer merely peace for the territories, great and small, with which we are directly concerned; it is no longer merely a peace for the continents, it is peace for the peoples. This program speaks for itself; there is nothing to be added to it.  Let us try, gentlemen, to do our work speedily and well.  I am handing to the Bureau the rules of procedure of the Conference, and these will be distributed to you all.

I come now to the order of the day.  The first question is as follows: “The responsibility of the authors of the war.”  The second is thus expressed: “Penalties for crimes committed during the war.”  The third is: “International legislation in regard to labour.”

The Powers whose interests are only in part involved are also invited to send in memoranda in regard to matters of all kinds – territorial, financial, or economic – which affect them particularly.  These memoranda should be addressed to the general secretariat of the Conference.

This system is somewhat novel.  Our desire in asking you to proceed thus is to save time.  All the nations represented here are free to present their claims.  You will kindly send in these memoranda as speedily as possible, as we shall then get on with the work which we shall submit for your consideration.  You can deal with the third question from the standpoint of the organization of labour.

It is a very vast field.  But we beg of you to begin by examining the question as to the responsibility of the authors of the war.  I do not need to set forth our reasons for this.  If we wish to establish justice in the world we can do so now, for we have won victory and can impose the penalties demanded by justice.

We shall insist on the imposition of penalties on the authors of the abominable crimes committed during the war.  Has any one any question to ask in regard to this?  If not, I would again remind you that every delegation should devote itself to the study of this first question, which has been made the subject of reports by eminent jurists, and of a report which will be sent to you entitled, “An Inquiry into the Criminal Responsibility of the Emperor William II.”

The perusal of this brochure will, without doubt, facilitate your work.  In Great Britain and in America studies on this point have also been published.  No one having any remark to make, the program is adopted.

It only remains for me to say, gentlemen, that the order of the day for our next sitting will begin with the question of the Society of Nations.  Our order of the day, gentlemen, is now brought to an end.  Before closing the sitting, I should like to know whether any delegate of the Powers represented has any question to submit to the Bureau.  As we must work in complete agreement, it is to be desired that members of the Conference shall submit all the observations they consider necessary.

The Bureau will welcome the expression of opinions of all kinds and will answer all questions addressed to it. No one has anything further to say?  The sitting is closed.

Source Records of the Great War, Vol. VII, ed. Charles F. Horne, National Alumni 1923

Share this:

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

2008 marks the 90th Anniversary of the end of WWI

20 Thursday Nov 2008

Posted by Diana Mandache in European royal families, World War One

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

11 November 1918, Armistice Day, Emperor Wilhelm II, European royal families, Familia regala, First World War, Habsburg, King George V, Leaders, Primul Razboi mondial, Regele Ferdinand, Regina Maria, Royalty, Tsar Nicholas II of Russia, World War One, Zog I

alliedrulersconsorts1914_2

Allied Rulers & their consorts - Diana Mandache collection

 

 At the end of the First World War Europe changed its political configuration, new states appearing on the map in the aftermath of the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman and Russian empires.

  

  

 tripleentante

 

lideriwwi2

Rulers WWI - Diana Mandache collection

  

 

wwi-kings-1914_1

Rulers 1914 - Diana Mandache collection

 

cartoon_wilhelm-ii-ferdinand_

 

Bulgaria, a defeated country, has maintained its monarchical form of state, but the tsar Ferdinand forced by the Allies abdicated in 1918 in favour of his son Boris III. Greece also a winner in the war, has swung between the monarchical and republican regimes. Here the monarchy survived until 1924 when a short-lived republic was proclaimed; in 1935 through a military coup and a plebiscite the monarchy was reinstalled and King George II regained the throne. Albania regained its independence in 1920. The monarchy was maintained with a Regency since 1914 when the prince of Wied renounced at the leadership of the country. In 1925 it was proclaimed a republic and a local chieftain, Ahmed Zogu, was elected president. Albania was proclaimed monarchy in 1928 and Zogu declared himself King Zog I.

 

After the fall of the tsar’s empire, the new Soviet Union emerged, and for a while the Bolshevik regime threatened to take over in Hungary and Germany. The Hungarian soviet republic of Bela Kun was quickly defeated in 1919 by the Romanian army.

 

On European thrones fundamental changes thus took place in Germany where the Kaiser was forced to abdicate in November 1918. Wilhelm II sought exile in Netherlands, a neutral power in the war, where he lived for the rest of his life. In Austro-Hungary Karl of Habsburg, emperor of Austria and king of Hungary (under the name of Charles IV) abdicated in 1918 and went into exile in Switzerland. The newly created states of Austria and Hungary adopted constitutions and special laws which abolished the right of succession for the Habsburgs. The peace treaties did not include reference to the House of Austria and its problems. But in February 1920 at the Conference of ambassadors, Alliate Powers declared that they will not accept a Habsburg restoration. After some unsuccessfully attempts to regain the throne in Hungary in March and October 1921 Karl went in exile in Madeira where he died in 1922.

 

russia-royalfamily-tsar-n-ii-etc_

The Imperial Family of Russia - Diana Mandache collection

                                                                                                                            

  From among all monarchs the most tragically fate was that of tsar Nicholas II and his family who were murdered by the Bolsheviks.  

 

©Diana Mandache and http://royalromania.wordpress.com 2008. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Diana Mandache and http://royalromania.wordpress.com “Diana Mandache’s Weblog – Royal History” with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Share this:

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

♣ Welcome to the royal history weblog written by Diana Mandache

♣

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,858 other followers

♣ My Forthcoming Book

♣ Dearest Missy (October 2011)

♣ Blogul meu: JURNAL de ISTORIC

♣ Queen Marie of Romania

♣ Categories

  • 1
  • Anniversaries & Birthdays
  • Asian Royalty
  • Book Reviews
  • British Royal Family
  • Bucharest
  • European royal families
  • Events
  • Exhibitions
  • Films & Interviews
  • Funerals
  • Historic Residences
  • Miscellaneous
  • Polls & Surveys
  • Romanian Royal Family
  • Royal Books
  • Royal Ceremonies
  • Royal jewels
  • Royal Tombs & Graves
  • Weekly Picture
  • World War One
Map

♣ My twitpic

Catherine Middleton, The Duchess of Cambridge, visits Rose Hi... on Twitpic

♣ My Flickr

The Last Rose of Summer

More Photos

♣ Recent Posts

  • Antique poster of the great 1906 Royal Jubilee Exhibition in Bucharest
  • Support for monarchy is at all time high
  • X Ray picture of Queen Elisabeth of Romania’s hand taken with an early Roentgen machine
Follow this blog

♣ Copyright details

Creative Commons License
Diana Mandache's Weblog by Diana Mandache is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at royalromania.wordpress.com.

♣ You can also find me on TWITTER

  • “Patrie & Destin” lansare de carte la Bookfest Pavilion 15 stand Litera nblo.gs/y8ub4 19 hours ago
  • "Patrie & Destin" lansare de carte la Bookfest Pavilion 15 stand Litera wp.me/p1fFMQ-14r 19 hours ago
  • As dori sa va anunt lansarea oficiala a cartii mele 'Patrie si Destin. Principesa Mostenitoare a Romaniei' si va... fb.me/12WbaGTNQ 20 hours ago
MyFreeCopyright.com Registered & Protected
Queen Marie of Romania. Regina Maria 

♣ Blogroll

  • Historic Houses of Romania
  • Lost in the Myths of History
  • Marlene Koenig
  • Royal Book News

 Subscribe in a reader

Watch videos at Vodpod.

♣ Archives

♣ Royal Websites

  • Afghanistan Royal Family
  • Albanian Royal Family
  • Bahrain Monarchy
  • Belgian Monarchy
  • Bhutan Monarchy
  • Bourbons of Naples
  • Brazil Imperial House
  • British Monarchy
  • Brunei Sultanate
  • Bulgaria: King Simeon II
  • Cambodian Monarchy
  • Danish Monarchy
  • Dubai: the Emir
  • Dutch Royal House
  • Ethiopian Imperial Family
  • France: Royal House
  • German Monarchy
  • Greek Royal Family
  • Hawaiian Royal Family
  • Iran: Empress Farah Pahlavi
  • Iran: Shah Reza II
  • Iraqi Monarchy
  • Italian Royal Family
  • Japanese Imperial Family
  • Jordanian Monarchy
  • Kuwait Monarchy
  • Lesotho Monarchy
  • Liechtenstein: Princely Family
  • Luxembourg Monarchy
  • Mexico
  • Monaco: House of Grimaldi
  • Montenegrin Royal Family
  • Moroccan Monarchy
  • Napoleon Bonaparte
  • Norwegian Royal family
  • Oman: Sultanate
  • Osman Imperial House
  • Otto von Habsburg
  • Portuguese Royal Family
  • Prince Radu of Romania
  • Princess Margarita of Romania
  • Qatar Monarchy
  • Romanian Royal Family
  • Russian Imperial Family
  • Saudi Arabia Monarchy
  • Saxe-Coburg-Gotha House
  • Serbian Royal Family
  • Sophie of Romania
  • Spanish Royal Family
  • Swaziland Monarchy
  • Swedish Royal Court
  • Thailand Monarchy
  • Tongan Monarchy
  • Unione Monarchica Italiana

♣ Tags

Balkans British Royal Family Carmen Sylva Casa Regala Crown Princess Margarita of Romania Diana Mandache Eastern Europe European royal families Familia regala Familia regala romana Greek Royal family History Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen Imperial Russia istoria regalitatii King Carol I King Ferdinand King Michael of Romania Monarhia Noblesse et Royautés non reigning monarchs Prince Radu Principele Radu Principesa Margareta Queen-Mother Helen Queen Anne Queen Elizabeth II Queen Elizabeth of Romania Queen Marie of Romania Regele Carol I Regele Ferdinand Regele Mihai Regina Ana Regina Elena Regina Elisabeta Regina Maria Romania Romanian Royal Family Romanov Royal jewels Royal Palaces Royalty Royal weddings Serbian Royal family South-East European Monarchs
I offer specialist research services on royalty subjects and Romanian history (19-20th century) for institutions or the press. To discuss your particular plan, please contact me on: e-mail: dianamandache@yahoo.co.uk

All rights reserved ©Diana Mandache

Blog at WordPress.com. Theme: Chateau by Ignacio Ricci.

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.